CIDOC-CRM and Machine Learning: A Survey and Future Research

CIDOC CRM and Epigraphy: a Hermeneutic Challenge

This paper identifies the main concepts involved in the study of epigraphy and proposes the use of CIDOC CRM to encode epigraphic concepts and to model the scientific process of investigation related to the study of epigraphy. After analysing the existing CIDOC CRM entities and those provided by the CRMsci and CRMarchaeo extensions, we introduce more specific epigraphic classes to be used as th...

METS and the CIDOC CRM – a Comparison

Dublin Core and CIDOC CRM Harmonization

According to the literature, there are many XML metadata mapping to the CIDOC CRM ontology efforts, since this ontology is considered one of the most appropriate models in integration architecture. On the other hand, Dublin Core is the most used metadata in semantic web applications. In this way, metadata can be mapped into an ontology to provide interoperability of its data and to achieve info...

CIDOC CRM in Action - Experiences and Challenges

If you have any questions, please contact: [email protected] [email protected] The Archaeological Sites Finds Identifier application is a tool for expert users and nonprofessionals to identify findings made all over Europe. In our prototype implementation, developed in course of the BRICKS project, the integrated findings are restricted to coins found in the Uni...

Types and Annotations for CIDOC CRM Properties

The CIDOC CRM provides an extensive ontology for describing entities and properties appearing in cultural heritage (CH) documentation, history and archeology. CRM provides some means for describing information about properties (property types, attribute assignment, and "long-cuts") and guidelines for extending the vocabulary. However, these means are far from complete, and in some cases there i...